Ancient Astronauts And Contemporary Skepticism

Over the course of the past yr, I carefully assisted a colleague in writing a collection of ten articles overlaying diverse facets of my ancient astronaut theory. All ten of those articles circulated extensively across the globe and look at counters on many sites indicated plentiful readership, but suggestions to me, or to her, from wherever, was non-existent. There was neither criticism nor acclaim from anybody. Simply silence. I was beginning to assume that maybe nobody in world needs to take historic astronauts severely.

In an try to make some progress, I decided to pay sixty dollars for a review of my ancient astronaut web site. In fact, this was to be a evaluate by skeptics; a evaluation by New Age believers can be worthless. Their weblog’s description was “crucial reviews of paranormal claims on the Internet.” The middleman granted them 5 days to perform their overview however that has lengthy since come and gone, and never a phrase from them. My website presents an unlimited quantity of evidence and, in truth, I couldn’t count on anybody to supply crucial evaluate in simply five days. Nobody, together with myself, would wish to see shortly ready and frivolous arguments, else I would make them look ridiculous in my counter arguments. Furthermore, a few of my evidence comes from Spanish-language sources and, to start, they would want time to confirm that none of it is a hoax. They’re welcome to all the time they need.

What to expect from this blog is unsure. There are skeptics who are as narrow-minded of their considering as their New Age counterparts, after which once more, there are skeptics, like me, who objectively consider the evidence to reach on the fact. Was there an actual ancient astronaut? To help the skeptics reply that question, I’ll give them some ideas on how to refute my theories. Right here, solely for area concerns, I’ll concentrate on the archaeological evidence, leaving aside concepts on refute the cryptology and theology proof for another day.

My website reproduces engravings from the Tiwanaku civilization in Bolivia. A kind of engravings depicts the alleged historical astronaut as an aquatic with a three-pronged tail, with each of the three prongs ending in a pod. How do the skeptics refute that? Easy. They simply have to display that the form of those pods resembles some type of animal or plants to be present in that region. In other phrases, they should discover a terrestrial source for those engravings, otherwise my extraterrestrial arguments stay unhurt.      The timing of the Tiwanaku sky-god drawings coincides with the timing of the Nazca Traces in Peru, so the traditional astronaut of each places needs to be one and the identical. For Nazca, the skeptics will discover many ready-made arguments, however I think about all of them weak. The mentality of the folks of Nazca cannot be assumed to be distinctive in human history. It must be demonstrated that individuals elsewhere also believed that the sun, moon, or sky-spirits had physical eyes that would observe ground drawings. Alternatively, it must be demonstrated that the people of Nazca worshipped birds, believing them to have cognitive intelligence.

The recorded engravings on the cosmological Solar Disk, alleged alien artifact, could prove to be the biggest challenge for the skeptics. How are we to imagine that the Andeans of the early sixteenth century a) knew that the Earth was spherical, b) knew that it was doable to orbit the Earth, c) knew that daylight hanging the moon may replicate again to strike a spaceship, d) knew that the dark clouds along the Milky Approach contained stars inside, and e) knew that water formed the basis of plant and animal evolution? Here the skeptics would wish to seek out parallels in the history of western civilization. I look forward to their response. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *